← Back to shelf

Desk reference

Source selection authority and competition paths

Who decides in , and which competition path was chosen before anyone scores a proposal.

1 / 2

Source selection authority (SSA)

The () — often the unless the agency head appoints someone else — establishes an evaluation team, ensures evaluation against the ’s factors, considers advisory recommendations, and selects the source whose proposal is the best value to the Government. In Part 15 negotiated acquisitions, the team evaluates against stated factors; the SSA owns the selection judgment.

Watch for

Don’t let “the board picked the winner” replace the SSA’s decision. Scoring every proposal alone is not the SSA’s default job, and the evaluation team does not own the selection.

"The source selection authority shall— … Ensure that proposals are evaluated based solely on the factors and subfactors contained in the solicitation … Select the source or sources whose proposal is the best value to the Government."

2 / 2

Full and open, set-aside, and sole-source

For acquisitions within Part 6’s , is the general rule. A small-business limits eligibility under Part 19 without requiring a separate Part 6 justification. A path needs an applicable FAR 6.302 authority and, when required, a written — not program-office preference alone. Orders and other acquisitions outside Part 6 follow their own limited-source or rules. At strategy time, name the competition path and the eligibility consequences for your structure before you spend as if the field were already fixed.

Watch for

Don’t confuse a set-aside with a sole-source award. Full and open does not mean a large business must be allowed to win a total small-business set-aside. Vehicle brand names do not rewrite competition rules.

Further reading